Biography Of Ludwig Van Beethoven s Life On All Levels Of...

Decmber 16th 1770 in Bonn Ludwig Van Beethoven was created to be soon form into one of the greatest people that ever walked the earth. As a composer, Ludwig Beethoven can be considered the equivalent of any of today’s stars of popular music. His trend setting compositions made music an integral part of life on all levels of society from the royal courts to the general population. His mass appeal can be attributed to his standard defying compositions that forcibly modernized the 18th century music scene. As with the invention of electric instruments in the 20th century, Beethoven’s powerful playing style and innovation techniques, introduced a new way of perceiving and listening to music. His deafness which was seen as restriction to many,†¦show more content†¦In one moment he could show great respect toward a commoner and then show no regard or respect for the nobles and royalty who were his financial supporters. As with any genius, he preferred the company of other musicians, poets and artists. It can be said that living in a society that prided itself on patronage of artists allowed Beethove n to reach his full potential. As many did before him, Beethoven used his skills to enrich himself and to expand his influence in the discipline of music. Beethoven was considered to be both confused and confusing by a great number of people who knew him. As his volatile mood swings became more erratic, the only things that stayed constant about him were his music and his explosive mood swings. In light of modern medical knowledge, Beethoven was almost certainly bi-polar. This condition was made worse by his alcohol addiction and gradual withdrawing from family and close friends. His eventual death from liver failure was possibly caused by his use of alcohol to mask symptoms of other medical issues. He self-medicated through alternating bouts of alcoholism and brilliant creativity. In modern times, medical treatment and counseling would have surely helped him, but Beethoven lived in a time where genius and madness often went hand in hand. What defines greatness within a musician what does it take to be a legend. To try and make

The Root Of Poverty - 2011 Words

Question 1 The questions of whether poverty is the result of institution or perhaps a byproduct of â€Å"laws of nature† is quite a complex one. Backers of both arguments have extensively argued for their respective stance on the matter. Further complications arise from the fact that not all the backers agree on what constitutes certain concepts of interests, such as happiness. Defining a cutoff point for poverty throughout a country, and even more so, in the world also challenges†¦. Additionally, the same people might not possess complete information due to various circumstances. Nevertheless, they can still have valid and useful information which could be improved upon to investigate the question of the root of poverty. Poverty is defined as, the lack of resources to achieve basic human needs. The World Bank defies is as the â€Å"pronounced deprivation in well-being.† These definitions present us with the initial difficulties plaguing our economic search. How does one defy poverty in an economic sense? For example, measuring poverty in poorer countries might be based on proxies such as what a household owns; whether it’s a television, the size of the house, if the house has dirt or a concreate floor, and so on, since poorer countries tend to have higher unemployment rates, and often have an agricultural economy. Countries on the other end of the spectrum tend to use income as a good first indicator of poverty. Because of this, one of the basic methods of measuring poverty is byShow MoreRelatedThe Roots of Poverty and Globalization2272 Words   |  9 PagesThe Question: Globalization and poverty Once the Era of apartheid had come to an end in 1994 the internationally development community entered South Africa promoting the microcredit model with high hopes to empower the poorest black communities to break loose from the poverty spiral, however the Microcredit model was seen to be having the complete opposite effect, ultimately causing incredible damage to the area. The microcredit model was supposed to be the means of bringing sustainable developmentRead MorePoverty: The Root Cause of Homelessness549 Words   |  2 Pageshomelessness in the country have been reported but none has gathered as much support as poverty. Poverty alone accounts for major increase in homeless households while other possible reasons include loss of job, eroding job opportunities, lack of public assistance and lack of affordable housing facilities. Despite these being powerful reasons, they are all linked to one major reason i.e. poverty. Support: Poverty is considered the most common and pervasive cause of homelessness because everythingRead MoreEssay on The Root Causes and Solutions to Poverty676 Words   |  3 Pagesstrongly in certain things, all of our ideas on poverty fall on the same path. Unfortunately, as reality points out, is that inside the walls of the White House, where it is commonly believed that actual progress is happening, ideas on poverty revolve around stock exchange, whose ideas only benefit those who get elected. Subsequently, these elected officials lead a group or campaign in a worthless round of unethical ideas that instead of helping poverty, increases U.S. debt. It is also commonly misinterpretedRead MoreTheological Reflection on the Root Causes of Poverty Essay641 Words   |  3 Pagessuch as poverty that causes numinous members of the society to look for solutions to these issues. A common way that the people of today’s society use as a solution to solve the problem of poverty is to gi ve money to those individuals who are subjected to this way of life. The problem with this solution is that many of these people do not see the logical flaw that is bottled up in this answer to the problem. They do not see that they are not attacking the root causes of what caused poverty. The rootRead MorePoverty Is The Parent Of Crime And Revolution1635 Words   |  7 PagesPoverty is seen in the eyes of a child whose meals are school provided and the sun’s distance is synonymous with the reality of seeing a day where their parents can provide a home cooked meal every night. Poverty is felt on the cement of a corner where a window rolls down and two hands touch the surface of a crumbly dollar bill, one giving and one receiving. Greek Philosopher and scientist Aristotle once said, â€Å"Poverty is the parent of crime and revolution.† Poverty will either make a person takeRead MoreEssay about Agricultural Effects of the Drip Irrigation System1587 Words   |  7 PagesWater is passed through these pipes which end at near the roots of the plants. This makes the water loss minimal. Initial stage is designing the system and its installation follows it. The article states the advantages and disadvantages of the system and also cites evidence with regard to the social, economic and environmental aspects. Poverty is one of the primary concerns the world faces in its road to development. Eradication of poverty tends to be the prime aims of governments worldwide. LackRead MoreComparison of the Autobiography of Malcolm X and Joan Didions Where I Was From1010 Words   |  4 Pageswithin the period of the 1920s to the 1960s. Some themes this essay will address is the idea of family and ones roots, the impact of poverty on families and ones psyche, and how the economy affects citizens. Any similarities between the books will also be discussed. These two books are a fairly unique grouping to be comparing, since Didions book mainly focuses on trying to find her roots in her home state of California, mainly, what it means to be Californian, and what it means to be a Didion. SheRead MorePoverty Is A Global Issue1448 Words   |  6 PagesPoverty is a global issue known by many people, it affects people in many ways, and can be considered a constant battle. The war on poverty has been ongoing for many years not only in the United States, but also amongst various countries. A significant country dealing with poverty is South Africa, which has struggled to provide jobs, education, and social security, to its people for numerous years. Moreover, the same applies to countries like the United States. Our first impression is that the UnitedRead MoreThe Main Cause Of Famine On Africa1674 Words   |  7 Pages Africa has been associated with famine for a long period of time and is still the case today.Research has shown that more than 90 million people living in Africa have been affected by hunger and are malnourished.This raises a question of what the root causes of this problem could be, considering that this has been an ongoing problem. Some people suggest that the main cause of famine in Africa over the years and is still the case today is natural disasters.While environmental catastrophes may haveRead MorePoverty And Its Effects On Society1566 Words   |  7 Pages Poverty is about not having enough money to meet basic needs including food, clothing and shelter. However poverty is more than not just having money. In addition to a lack of money, poverty is about not being able to participate in recreational activities; Not being able to send children on a day trip with classmates or to a birthday party, and not being able to pay for medications in times of illness. The poorest people will also have less access to health, education and other vital services.

Gun Control Good Or Bad Essay Example For Students

Gun Control Good Or Bad Essay Gun ControlPart I:IntroductionThe issue of gun control and violence, both in Canada and the United States,is one that simply will not go away. If history is to be any guide, no matterwhat the resolution to the gun control debate is, it is probable that thearguments pro and con will be much the same as they always have been. In 1977,legislation was passed by the Canadian Parliament regulating long guns for thefirst time, restructuring the availability of firearms, and increasing a varietyof penalties . Canadian firearms law is primarily federal, and therforenational in scope, while the bulk of the firearms regulation in the UnitedStates is at the state level; attempts to introduce stricter leglislation at thefederal level are often defeated. We will write a custom essay on Gun Control Good Or Bad specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The importance of this issue is that not all North Americans are necessarilysupportive of strict gun control as being a feasible alternative to controllingurban violence. There are concerns with the opponents of gun control, that theprofessional criminal who wants a gun can obtain one, and leaves the averagelaw-abiding citizen helpless in defending themselves against the perils of urbanlife . Is it our right to bear arms as North Americans ? Or is it privilege? Andwhat are the benefits of having strict gun control laws? Through the analysis ofthe writings and reports of academics and experts of gun control and urbanviolence, it will be possible to examine the issues and theories of the socialimpact of this issue. Part II: Review of the Literature A) SummaryIn a paper which looked at gun control and firearms violence in North America,Robert J. Mundt, of the University of North Carolina, points out that Crime inAmerica is popularly perceived in Canada as something to be expected in asociety which has less respect for the rule of law than does CanadiansocietyIn 1977, the Canadian government took the initiative to legislate stricter guncontrol. Among the provisions legislated by the Canadian government was aFirearms Acquisition Certificate for the purchase of any firearm, andstrengthened the registration requirements for handguns and other restrictedweapons . The purpose of the 1977 leglislation was to reduce the availability offirearms, on the assumption that there is a positive relationship betweenavailability and use. In Robert J. Mundts study, when compared with the UnitedStates, trends in Canada over the past ten years in various types of violentcrime, suicide, and accidental death show no dramatic results, and fewsuggestions of perceptible effects of the 1977 Canadian gun control legislation. The only positive effect, Mundt, found in the study was the decrease in the useof firearms in robbery with comparion to trends in the United States . Informed law enforcement officers in Canada, as in the United States, view theimpact of restricting the availability of firearms is more likely to impact onthose violent incidents that would not have happened had a weapon been athand(152). In an article by Gary A. Mauser of the Simon Fraser University in BritishColumbia, he places special emphasis on the attitudes towards firearms displayedby both Canadians and Americans. According to Mauser, large majorities of thegeneral public in both countries support gun control legislation whilesimultaneously believing that they have the right to own firearms (Mauser1990:573). Despite the similarities, there are apparent differences between thegeneral publics in the two countries. As Mauser states that Canadians are moredeferent to authority and do not support the use of handguns in self defence tothe same extent as Americans. As Mauser points out that it has been argued that cultural differencesaccount for why Canada has stricter gun control legislation than the UnitedStates(575). Surprisingly enough, nationwide surveys in both Canada and theUnited States show remarkable similarity in the public attitude towardsfirearms and gun control(586). Both Canada and the United States wereoriginally English colonies, and both have historically had similar patterns ofimmigration. Moreover, Canadians are exposed to American television (bothentertainment and news programming) and, Canadians and Americans read many ofthe same books and magazines. As a result of this, the Canadian public hasadopted much of the American culture . In an article by Catherine F. Sproule and Deborah J. Kennett of TrentUniversity, they looked at the use of firearms in Canadian homicides between theyears of 1972-1982. There findings firmly support the conclusion that guncontrol is beneficial. According to Sproule and Kennett, gun control may beinfluencing some suspects to kill by other methods, but it is less likely forthese suspects to kill multiple victims. From the study conducted by Sprouleand Kennett the rate of violent crimes was five times greater in the U.S thanCanada, and almost double the rate of firearm use in American than Canadianhomicides (32-33). In short, the use of firearms in Canadian homicides hasdeclined since the legislative changes in gun control in 1977. .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e , .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .postImageUrl , .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e , .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e:hover , .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e:visited , .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e:active { border:0!important; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e:active , .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u821067d431836d29952db280457f961e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Nazism Argumentative EssayAs mentioned in lectures, Canadian cities have been traditionally safer, andless vulnerable to Crime Waves than our American neighbours due to ourextensive police force and gun control laws . A factor to be considered, though,is our national heritage or culture which holds traditions of passiveness andpeace unlike the American Frontier heritage. From our textbook, Why NothingWorks , Marvin Harris points out that the American Constitution guaranteescitizens the right to bear arms, and this has made it possible for U.S. criminals to obtain firearms more readily than their counterparts in countrieslike Japan. Marvin Harris indicates that the high rate of homicide in theUnited States undoubtedly reflects, to some extent, the estimated 50 millionhandguns and rifles legally and illegally owned by the American people (122). As demonstrated in the film: Cops, Guns, and Drugs, the problem with controllingurban violence in the United States is that it is out of proportion in contrastto the available police force. In his book, The Saturday Night Special , Robert Sherrill explains the cheap,usually illegal, easily concealed handgun that plays a part in so many crimes inthe United States. He reviews the role of guns in American life from theshoot-outs of the Old West to the street violence of today. According toSherrill, most murders occur in shabby neighbourhoods; of the 690 murders inDetroit in 1971, for example, 575 occurred in the black slums mostly byhandguns. As a Detroit sociologist added to this alarming figure:Living in afrustrating stress-inducing environment like the United States every day of yourlife makes many people walking powder kegs (38). In agreement with thisstatement, Sherrill suggests that the hardest hit of all American urban centresis the inter-cities of Los Angeles, New York, Detroit, and Washington. Thesecities largely consist of visible minorities who are frustrated with the handdealt to them, and simply resort to drugs, guns, and violence as a way of life. As discusse d in lecture, and viewed in the film: Cops, Guns, and Drugs, manyof the youth in the underclass who become involved in this way of life ,areconsidered to be old if they live past the age of 20 . In another paper by Catherine F. Sproule and Deborah J. Kennett, theycompared the incidence of killings by handguns, firearms other than handguns,and nonshooting methods between the United States and Canada for the years 1977to 1983. In their study they found that in Canada there were 443 handgunkillings per 100,000 people compared to 4108 in the U.S. over the period of1977-1983 . They also noted that the American murder rates for handguns arehigher than the total Canadian homicide rate(249). According to Sproule andKennett, Canadas favourable situation regarding murder relative to the UnitedStates is to a large measure the result of Canadian gun control, and Canadiansmust be vigilant against any erosion of our gun control provisions (250). B:Comparison:The works cited above are based on research done by experts and scholars inthe field of gun control and violence. Examining the above materials canidentify similarities and differences found in the various cited sources, sucharguments for and against gun control policy in North America. It is clearlyevident to see that opponents of strict gun control will have similar arguments. Firstly, they are usually defending each other against their opponents of theissue, and they see the benefits as far more greater than the setbacks. Theintroduction of the 1977 legislation by the Canadian government stronglysuggests that the country will benefit by having a safer society, and reductionin crime. According to Robert J. Mundt, a benefit reaped by this legislation hasbeen a trend away from the use of firearms in robberies has been noticeableever since the passage of the gun control provisions of the 1977 Bill C-51(Criminal Law Amendment Act). Mauser mentions that Canadians are moresupportive of stricter controls on handguns than are AmericansMoreover,Canadians appear to be less supportive of home owners using firearms to defendthemselves than are Americans (Mauser:587). This evaluation by Mauser suggeststhat Canadians do have confidence in gun control, and law enforcement incontrolling the safety of their well-being. Similarities can also be cited in the works of Harris and Sherrill whichdiscuss the effects of having the right to bear arms in the United States. According to Marvin Harris, Why Nothing Works , there has been a steadyincrease in the availability of firearms since 1945, this may account for muchof the increase in the homicide rate in the United States. Harris also suggeststhat America has developed a unique permanent racial underclass which provideconditions for both the motive and opportunity for violent criminal behaviour(123). In Sherrills book, The Saturday Night Special , a major topic of concernis the status structure of the street gang in which success in defense of theturf brings deference and reputationHere the successful exercise of violenceis a road to achievement. As Sherrill mentions, this violence is exercised bythe means of a gun that can be easily obtained in the United States due to theeasy accessibility of guns. .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d , .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .postImageUrl , .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d , .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d:hover , .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d:visited , .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d:active { border:0!important; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d:active , .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u739343fe5abbc118aeeb14eed7d90c1d:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Procrastination EssayThere are also some worthwhile differences found in the literature citedabove. For one, Sproule and Kennett , indicate that gun ownership in the UnitedStates is inversely related to individuals lack of confidence in collectiveinstitutions to protect their security of person and property. RobertSherrill believes that the vast majority of people who own guns , simply ownthem because it is a part of their American heritage, and the constitution givesthem the right to bear arms'(1973:225). He suggests that Americans choose topractice their civil liberties to its entirety. Other notable differences in the literature is Mausers view for thedifferences in the gun-control legislation between the two countries. Mauserstates that the cause for this is the differences in political elites andinstitutions rather than in public opinion (1990:587). Due to Canadaspolitical structure, it is a lot easier to make and approve laws in comparisonwith the United States Congress structure. Part III: Thesis StatementAfter researching all the data collected from the library and the use ofcourse-related materials, I have formulated my own theory on the social impactof gun control and violence in North America. Going back to the introduction, Ihave asked the reader two questions :(1) Is it our right to bear arms as NorthAmericans? Or is it a privilege?, and (2) What are the benefits of having strictgun control laws? It appears to me that much of the literature cited above looksat gun control as being a feasible alternative in reducing homicides and armedrobbery. From the authors cited above, there findings undermine the apparentclaim of gun control opponents in their slogan people kill, guns dont . Theintroduction of gun control in Canada significantly shows that Canadian guncontrol, especially the provisions pertaining to handguns, does have thebeneficial effect of reducing violent crime, and saving lives. Part IV: AnalysisAnd ConclusionsWhen looking at the 1977 Canadian Legislation of gun control, it is easy tosee that there is some bias and assumptions present. For one, it assumes thatleft to its own devices the legislation will make it virtually impossible for acriminal to obtain a handgun. Secondly, there is an assumption that if a persondoesnt have a criminal record (it doesnt neccessarily mean that they are law-abiding) then they are eligible to obtain a firearm with an FAC (firearmsAcquisition Certificate). With the implementation of Bill C-51, a Black Marketfor illegal handguns has emerged from the United States into Canada, making itextremely easy for the professional criminal to obtain a firearm. It can be agreed that since the implementation of Bill C-51 in 1977, Canadahas remained relatively safe in incidents involving firearms in comparison tothe United States. The assumption of many Americans, is that having the rightto bear arms increases their security is open to dispute. It is just asreasonable to assume that restricting the right to bear arms will increase thesafety and security of a society. In accordance with many sociologists beliefs,is that Canada historically hasnt experienced the problems of crime, that theUnited States has, because of its central police force. In addition, Sproule and Kennett view the significant effect of gun controlis the method of killing. Although gun control may be influencing some suspectsto kill by other methods, it is less likely for these suspects to kill multiplevictims. As witnessed by the American media, mass murder in public is much morea common occurrence in the U.S. than Canada. It is safe to say that gun controlhas saved the lives of potential innocent victims of crime. Furthermore, as was mentioned in class discussion and lectures, the strengthor influences of the mass media to glorify violence has had detrimental effectson North American society. In some ways, the act of violence has beendesensitised and glorified rather than being displayed as an unacceptable formof behaviour. This portrayal by the media, has made handguns and other firearmsseem fashionable in the eyes of our youth and general population in NorthAmerica. This unquestionably places our law enforcement agencies at aconsiderable disadvantage, simply because it erodes the confidence and trustdisplayed in them by the general public. Presently, Canada does have the advantage of gun control unlike the U.S. situation. We are now living in an environment that has seen dramatic increasein violent crime, over a short period of time. Whether the United States adoptsa gun control policy similar to Canadas, remains to be seen. As for Canadians,we must maintain confidence in the police and justice system to protect ourcollective security as an important means by which to deter gun acquisition. Society must place limits on cultures appetites Durkheim

Robin Lee Essays (253 words) - Biotechnology, Preventive Medicine

Robin Lee Ms. Kayla Murphy English 9 Sept 21, 2015 Vaccinating Kid Should Be a Parental Choice Life is important and as everybody knows, preventing people from deadly illnesses is also very important. It is strange that some people don ' t believe that vaccinations are effective. Despite years of scientific research and testing, people still choose to be ignorant and hard-headed. Vaccinations should not be a topic of debate because vaccines available have been tested and proven that they are effective. If vaccines weren ' t prove, doctors weren ' t be able to use vaccines but it has been approved by government and CDC so people should have faith to the government, CDC, and to the doctors. There are many different kinds of illness threatening the lives of people. Prevention is always better than to get something unexpected without preventing. When treating illnesses, it costs a lot of money and time to treat it. Vaccinations can not only prevent from illnesses but it also takes a little time and money. I think that getting vaccinations on their children means that they love their children and don ' t want them to become sick. But, when I see people who disagree with getting vaccinations on their children, it means that they don ' t really care about suffering their child from illness when they get the illness. Some parents don ' t think about how much money, time and suffering their children would have after having an illness.